Re: [Python-Dev] Remove str.find in 3.0?
29 Aug
2005
29 Aug
'05
12:53 p.m.
Raymond writes:
That suggests that we need a variant of split() that has been customized for typical find/index use cases. Perhaps introduce a new pair of methods, partition() and rpartition()
+1 My only suggestion is that when you're about to make a truly inspired suggestion like this one, that you use a new subject header. It will make it easier for the Python-Dev summary authors and for the people who look back in 20 years to ask "That str.partition() function is really swiggy! It's everywhere now, but I wonder what language had it first and who came up with it?" -- Michael Chermside [PS: To explain what "swiggy" means I'd probably have to borrow the time machine.]
6826
Age (days ago)
6826
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Michael Chermside