Re: [Python-Dev] Shorter float repr in Python 3.1?
7 Apr
2009
7 Apr
'09
9:21 p.m.
It would have helped if I'd copied the list... Sorry, Paul. 2009/4/7 Paul Moore
2009/4/7 Michael Foord
: Mark Dickinson wrote:
[snip...] Discussion points =================
(1) Any objections to including this into py3k? If there's controversy, then I guess we'll need a PEP.
Big +1
(2) Should other Python implementations (Jython, IronPython, etc.) be expected to use short float repr, or should it just be considered an implementation detail of CPython? I propose the latter, except that all implementations should be required to satisfy eval(repr(x)) == x for finite floats x.
Short float repr should be an implementation detail, so long as eval(repr(x)) == x still holds.
What he said :-) Paul.
5491
Age (days ago)
5491
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Paul Moore