
At 01:34 AM 7/1/2009 +0200, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
That's not the scenario he's talking about. He's talking about the case where Ham has an 'install_requires' of Spam. That is, a runtime dependency, not a shared file.
Good question, I have never created such distribution. Aren't they read-only files ?
setuptools' bdist_egg command has an option to exclude source from an .egg, but it doesn't do anything special with permissions. I don't think any other current install tools support source-free installation.

2009/7/1 P.J. Eby <pje@telecommunity.com>:
Ah, right sorry I misunderstood... They are no plans to handle dependency installation / uninstallation / managment at distutils level. so if you remove Ham, it will not check what distributions use it. So yes, I'll add a note on this, That said, the APIs will be powerfull enough for a third-party package managers to handle this case by throwing for example a warning or an exception.

2009/7/1 P.J. Eby <pje@telecommunity.com>:
Ah, right sorry I misunderstood... They are no plans to handle dependency installation / uninstallation / managment at distutils level. so if you remove Ham, it will not check what distributions use it. So yes, I'll add a note on this, That said, the APIs will be powerfull enough for a third-party package managers to handle this case by throwing for example a warning or an exception.
participants (2)
-
P.J. Eby
-
Tarek Ziadé