Andrew MacIntyre <andymac@bullseye.apana.org.au> writes:

On 25 Mar 2002, Michael Hudson wrote:

...

Andrew MacIntyre <andymac@bullseye.apana.org.au> writes:

{...}

...

...

Sorry, I've not had time to look at this for the OS/2-EMX build; maybe tonight.

I thought OS/2-EMX was only going to be supported in 2.3? I'm certainly not going to port all those checkins you made to the -maint branch.

I wasn't expecting them to be backported, and I don't expect the release sourceball to contain the OS/2 EMX changes until 2.3 either.

Good.

I do however plan a binary release of 2.2.1 from my local CVS. If there were any problems apparently not related specifically to my OS/2 patches, I'd let you know.

It's getting kind of late for these to make any difference...

In particular the test_math run you requested feedback about (as a datapoint, not something you could/should resolve).

Again, good (the me not having to do anythign part :).

As I've had system problems, and am not sure whether I've got my local vendor-branch 2.2 CVS tree straightened out after importing 2.2C1, I haven't had anything to report :-(

Well, OK, it would be nice to have, but don't push yourself about it... Cheers, M. -- Monte Carlo sampling is no way to understand code. -- Gordon McMillan, comp.lang.python