I have updated PEP309 a little, mostly to add the SF patch numbers for the implementation (still waiting for someone to check it in), and to note that the '@' character has been claimed for decorators, although nobody really wanted it for PEP309 anyway. I hope there will still be time to squeeze it in before 2.4 beta 1, and if there is any reason why not (apart from there has to be a cut-off point somewhere, which I accept), please someone let me know what work is still needed to make it ready to go in. Thanks, Peter Harris scav at blueyonder co (uk)
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004, Peter Harris wrote:
I have updated PEP309 a little, mostly to add the SF patch numbers for the implementation (still waiting for someone to check it in), and to note that the '@' character has been claimed for decorators, although nobody really wanted it for PEP309 anyway.
I hope there will still be time to squeeze it in before 2.4 beta 1, and if there is any reason why not (apart from there has to be a cut-off point somewhere, which I accept), please someone let me know what work is still needed to make it ready to go in.
What's PEP309? (People reading python-dev do not all have all PEP numbers memorized, and it's not reasonable to expect everyone to go look them up when it would take you only a few moments to save everyone else time.) -- Aahz (aahz@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "To me vi is Zen. To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated. You discover truth everytime you use it." --reddy@lion.austin.ibm.com
participants (3)
-
Aahz -
Peter Harris -
Raymond Hettinger