I reviewed 5 issues and want to see http://bugs.python.org/issue7585 committed to Python 2.7 http://bugs.python.org/issue7443 test.support.unlink issue on Windows platform i race condition between os.unlink(), TortoiseSVN and os.open() - reporter changed OS and can't confirm bug anymore, need somebody with Windows and TortoiseSVN installed http://bugs.python.org/issue6703 cross platform failure and silly test in doctest i non-crossplatform check for absolute path when 'module_relative' is True - added patch - need testcases http://bugs.python.org/issue1659 Tests needing network flag? i skip tests that require network if network is not available - added patch - it is recommended to split issue to count skipped tests exactly and to probe which tests marked as 'require network' are actually don't http://bugs.python.org/issue2810 _winreg.EnumValue fails when the registry data includes multibyte unicode characters i WindowsError: [Error 234] More data is available when working with _winreg - original issue assumed that it is caused by multibyte string, however this can not be confirmed anymore - exception can be thrown when operating over long keys, this should be tested with WinAPI over ctypes, I propose to open new bug for long keys - another bug could be opened - it seems impossible to get values of Unicode keys with _winreg http://bugs.python.org/issue3778 python uninstaller leave registry entries - confirmed for 2.6.5 - need windows installer expert to create patch for cleaning empty registry keys -- anatoly t.
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 16:05:28 +0300, anatoly techtonik <techtonik@gmail.com> wrote:
I reviewed 5 issues and want to see http://bugs.python.org/issue7585 committed to Python 2.7
It may be a little too close to the feature freeze to get this reviewed and in to 2.7. I'll take a look at it tonight (I'm in GMT -4) if I can (and I think I can). -- R. David Murray www.bitdance.com
R. David Murray <rdmurray <at> bitdance.com> writes:
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 16:05:28 +0300, anatoly techtonik <techtonik <at>
gmail.com> wrote:
I reviewed 5 issues and want to see http://bugs.python.org/issue7585 committed to Python 2.7
It may be a little too close to the feature freeze to get this reviewed and in to 2.7.
This looks like a bug fix, not a new feature. Regards Antoine.
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 18:06:28 -0000, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
R. David Murray <rdmurray <at> bitdance.com> writes:
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 16:05:28 +0300, anatoly techtonik <techtonik <at>
gmail.com> wrote:
I reviewed 5 issues and want to see http://bugs.python.org/issue7585 committed to Python 2.7
It may be a little too close to the feature freeze to get this reviewed and in to 2.7.
This looks like a bug fix, not a new feature.
Well, yes, but it is also a behavior change. Is that OK for a Beta? --David
R. David Murray <rdmurray <at> bitdance.com> writes:
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 18:06:28 -0000, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
R. David Murray <rdmurray <at> bitdance.com> writes:
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 16:05:28 +0300, anatoly techtonik <techtonik <at>
gmail.com> wrote:
I reviewed 5 issues and want to see http://bugs.python.org/issue7585 committed to Python 2.7
It may be a little too close to the feature freeze to get this reviewed and in to 2.7.
This looks like a bug fix, not a new feature.
Well, yes, but it is also a behavior change. Is that OK for a Beta?
As soon as we consider the old behaviour a bug, I'd say yes. Besides, this is the first beta, things get stricter afterwards. Regards Antoine.
participants (3)
-
anatoly techtonik
-
Antoine Pitrou
-
R. David Murray