which actually will look something like this in real code:
def trade(yours, mine): print _('if you give me %(yours)s, i will give you %(mine)s') % { 'yours': yours, 'mine' : mine, }
The string wrapped in _() is what gets translated here.
Okay, we all know that's a pain, right?
What's wrong with
def trade(yours, mine): print _('if you give me %(yours)s, i will give you %(mine)s') % vars()
Look Ma, no magic!
Regards, Martin
"MvL" == Martin v Loewis martin@loewis.home.cs.tu-berlin.de writes:
MvL> What's wrong with
MvL> def trade(yours, mine): print _('if you give me MvL> %(yours)s, i will give you %(mine)s') % vars()
MvL> Look Ma, no magic!
Except that I also want globals() to be included and vars() doesn't include that. I really want:
d = globals().copy() d.update(locals())
but I've also noticed that you sometimes want attribute following so you can do things like
_('the name of the list is %(mlist.listname)')
-Barry
-
barry＠wooz.org -
Martin v. Loewis