Re: [Python-Dev] [Distutils] distlib updated with resources API
On 9/28/12 12:55 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Last but not least, distlib is the plan forward endorsed by python-dev, Is it? I haven't seen a PEP or an official decision about that. Just because someone proposed it on a mailing-list doesn't mean it is "endorsed by python-dev".
We discussed about this with Vinay, Nick and al on python-dev, based on Nick's document that describes what 'distlib' is. The document has changed since then, http://python-notes.boredomandlaziness.org/en/latest/pep_ideas/core_packagin... But the idea was to create a subset of 4 or 5 modules that implement the various PEPs. Vinay started to work on this and made progress. When I said "endorsed", I mean that most of the people in python-dev that care about packaging agreed or did not disagree. Now, if you disagree please say it. Or if you need an official decision, we need to first declare who is the current packaging BDFL maybe ? And since you seem interested in the topic maybe you could take that role ? Cheers Tarek
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Tarek Ziadé
On 9/28/12 12:55 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Last but not least, distlib is the plan forward endorsed by python-dev,
Is it? I haven't seen a PEP or an official decision about that. Just because someone proposed it on a mailing-list doesn't mean it is "endorsed by python-dev".
We discussed about this with Vinay, Nick and al on python-dev, based on Nick's document that describes what 'distlib' is.
The document has changed since then, http://python-notes.boredomandlaziness.org/en/latest/pep_ideas/core_packagin...
Yeah, don't read too much into the current state of that - it will eventually become a proposal for a standardised *in-memory* data structure to better support metadata interoperability between packaging tools, but it isn't there yet (although scrubbing every reference to "JSON file" and replacing it with "API data structure" would get you close - think of the overall idea as "like dictConfig, but for distribution metadata rather than logging configurations". We need something like that in order to allow import hooks to correctly supply distribution metadata). The original email thread from the removal of packaging from 3.3 is probably a better point of reference, with a concrete "distlib" PEP still on the todo list. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
participants (2)
-
Nick Coghlan -
Tarek Ziadé