Senthil Kumaran wrote:

http://bugs.python.org/issue2987

This deals with a feature request of parsing an IPv6 URL according to standards. The patch is pretty complete and we have good test coverage too.

Is it okay to include this in Python 2.7 b2 release? It would be a worthy addition.

1. The ultimate decision on that is with the release manager (i.e. Benjamin) 2. My personal recommendation is to allow it: while it *is* a new feature, it is a feature that doesn't change any API. Regards, Martin

Senthil Kumaran <orsenthil <at> gmail.com> writes:

http://bugs.python.org/issue2987

This deals with a feature request of parsing an IPv6 URL according to standards. The patch is pretty complete and we have good test coverage too.

Is it okay to include this in Python 2.7 b2 release? It would be a worthy addition.

It shouldn't have been committed to 3.1, though. Could you revert? Thanks Antoine.

Senthil Kumaran wrote:

http://bugs.python.org/issue2987

This deals with a feature request of parsing an IPv6 URL according to standards. The patch is pretty complete and we have good test coverage too.

Is it okay to include this in Python 2.7 b2 release? It would be a worthy addition.

1. The ultimate decision on that is with the release manager (i.e. Benjamin) 2. My personal recommendation is to allow it: while it *is* a new feature, it is a feature that doesn't change any API. Regards, Martin

Senthil Kumaran <orsenthil <at> gmail.com> writes:

http://bugs.python.org/issue2987

This deals with a feature request of parsing an IPv6 URL according to standards. The patch is pretty complete and we have good test coverage too.

Is it okay to include this in Python 2.7 b2 release? It would be a worthy addition.

It shouldn't have been committed to 3.1, though. Could you revert? Thanks Antoine.