Kevin Jacobs writes:

On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Guido van Rossum wrote:

...

...

You should name the type timestamp if you want to imply dt + n == dt + n seconds. datetime + n is commonly understood as dt + n *days*. [...] Is this just an mxDateTime convention, or is it in wider use? (URLs of docs of other languages / libraries would really help to convince me!)

I'm afraid that this really is the de-facto standard. However, lets be clear; is t=t+1 adding 1 (calendar) day or 24 hours (86400 seconds)?

Wouldn't this fall into the "explicit is better than implicit" bin? I.e. t + 1 should be an error? Cheers, M. -- US elections For those of you fearing that the rest of the world might be making fun of the US because of this: Rest assured, we are. -- http://www.advogato.org/person/jameson/diary.html?start=12