Fwd: survey about the use of agile practices
Anyone?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Selene Uras
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Anyone?
It was discarded as probable spam by me due to the lack of a valid "To:" line. Do you have any particular reason for believing that it's real? -- Aahz (aahz@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "I support family values -- Addams family values" --www.nancybuttons.com
Aahz wrote:
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Anyone?
It was discarded as probable spam by me due to the lack of a valid "To:" line. Do you have any particular reason for believing that it's real?
http://agile.diee.unica.it/uras.html (it's in italian) seems to make this credible. FWIW.
On 12/24/06, Aahz
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Anyone?
It was discarded as probable spam by me due to the lack of a valid "To:" line. Do you have any particular reason for believing that it's real?
Even apart from the website that Samuele found, the content sounded genuine. Just not something I feel like dealing with (too many surveys). -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
Guido van Rossum wrote:
Even apart from the website that Samuele found, the content sounded genuine. Just not something I feel like dealing with (too many surveys).
from what I can tell, it was blasted to everyone with a sourceforge account, which indicates that they're don't really care what projects or persons they get information from. even if it's a genuine survey, it's crap science. </F>
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Guido van Rossum wrote:
Even apart from the website that Samuele found, the content sounded genuine. Just not something I feel like dealing with (too many surveys).
from what I can tell, it was blasted to everyone with a sourceforge account, which indicates that they're don't really care what projects or persons they get information from. even if it's a genuine survey, it's crap science.
I was going to respond to the survey (I try to help out that kind of research when I can), but far too many of my responses would have been of the "it depends on what you mean by term X" variety (e.g. what's the dividing line between a unit test and an acceptance test? Does the fact that essentially all Python developers are also Python users count as users being involved in project management? Is refactoring still explicit when you're doing it specifically to make something else you want to do easier?). The biggest single flaw I found is that the survey assumes the reader is familiar with the Agile Manifesto's particular brand of KoolAid, without providing any context or links to additional information. Given the flaws in the survey itself, I don't see how anything meaningful could be extracted from the responses (and collating emailed survey responses manually is going to be one heckuva task). Cheers, Nick. P.S. <tinfoil hat> The *real* title of the thesis: An Investigation into the Response of Open Source Developers to Flawed Research Surveys };> -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
participants (5)
-
Aahz
-
Fredrik Lundh
-
Guido van Rossum
-
Nick Coghlan
-
Samuele Pedroni