After the augmented assignment checkin (yay!), I see two failing tests: test_augassign and test_parser. Do you see the same problem? Jeremy
On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 06:44:27PM -0400, Jeremy Hylton wrote:
After the augmented assignment checkin (yay!), I see two failing tests: test_augassign and test_parser. Do you see the same problem?
Hm, neither is failing, for me, in a tree that has no differences with the CVS tree according to CVS itself. I'll see if I can reproduce it by using a different tree, just to be sure. -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 06:56:15PM -0400, Jeremy Hylton wrote:
Oops. My mistake. I hadn't rebuilt the parser.
Well, you were on to something, of course. The parsermodule will have to be modified to accept augmented assignment as well. (Or at least, so I assume.) The test just doesn't test that part yet ;-) Fred, do you want me to do that? I'm not sure on the parsermodule internals, but maybe if you can give me some pointers I can work it out. (The same goes for Tools/compiler/compiler, by the way, which I think also needs to be taught list comprehensions.) -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
Jeremy Hylton writes:
After the augmented assignment checkin (yay!), I see two failing tests: test_augassign and test_parser. Do you see the same problem?
I'll be taking care of the parser module update tonight (late) or tomorrow morning. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at beopen.com> BeOpen PythonLabs Team Member
participants (3)
-
Fred L. Drake, Jr. -
Jeremy Hylton -
Thomas Wouters