...

...

...

...

types-sig

+1

-1. I think there may come interesting discussions on this list, when the time is due and things come up. Why dismiss it? It is a good place to have.

Sverker Nilsson

Plus, if you dismiss it I might be tempted to bring my thread about multimethods/overload resolution back to this list, and that would be messy... it was so neatly killed by diverting it to types-sig. ;-)

-Dave

I apologize for that! I had expected that some people on the type-sig who would be interested. But it proves that the types-sig is dead. It's had its chance. If there's really a need to revive it, well, there's a procedure for reviving SIG, too. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

...

...

...

...

types-sig

+1

-1. I think there may come interesting discussions on this list, when the time is due and things come up. Why dismiss it? It is a good place to have.

Sverker Nilsson

Plus, if you dismiss it I might be tempted to bring my thread about multimethods/overload resolution back to this list, and that would be messy... it was so neatly killed by diverting it to types-sig. ;-)

-Dave

I apologize for that! I had expected that some people on the type-sig who would be interested. But it proves that the types-sig is dead. It's had its chance. If there's really a need to revive it, well, there's a procedure for reviving SIG, too. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)