It's true for the default comparison definition for user defined classes, which is what that paragraph describes. -- Sent from my phone, thus the relative brevity :) On May 21, 2012 2:32 AM, "Terry Reedy" <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:

On 5/20/2012 4:31 AM, nick.coghlan wrote:

+ and ``x.__hash__()`` returns an appropriate value such that ``x == y``

...

+ implies both that ``x is y`` and ``hash(x) == hash(y)``.

I don't understand what you were trying to say with x == y implies x is y but I know you know that that is not true ;=0.

______________________________**_________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/**mailman/listinfo/python-dev<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/**mailman/options/python-dev/** ncoghlan%40gmail.com<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ncoghlan%40gmail.com>