I received the following from GvR in a private communication:
If good arguments against @ are presented it may be removed in 2.4b1 (that was always the plan but apparently not publicized).
I am going to take this as an invitation to discuss @ syntax again. Given the controversy, a reexamination of the major issues seems not only reasonable, but desirable. Please feel free to send me links to relevant discussion, but given the apparent lack of consensus at present I would not like to be told to read the entire py-dev archives.
Please bring up the Leo issues in Python-dev.
I'll be posting on separate threads soon. Edward -------------------------------------------------------------------- Edward K. Ream email: edreamleo@charter.net Leo: Literate Editor with Outlines Leo: http://webpages.charter.net/edreamleo/front.html --------------------------------------------------------------------
On 5-aug-04, at 21:47, Edward K. Ream wrote:
Please feel free to send me links to relevant discussion, but given the apparent lack of consensus at present I would not like to be told to read the entire py-dev archives.
Only the hunderds of messages about decorator syntax would do. That would avoid rehashing the same points over and over and over again without adding new information. Ronald
participants (2)
-
Edward K. Ream -
Ronald Oussoren