Nab those release blockers!
As we approach the planned first betas for 2.6/3.0, my heart sinks when I see the imposing list of 16 release blockers. [1] Luckily, most of the issues have patches that just need *your* review. Others, namely the Py3k exception issues, may require a little more discussion, but I'm sure we can get it done. Let's get this release on time! [clapping] [1] http://bugs.python.org/issue?%40sort0=activity&%40sortdir0=on&%40sort1=&%40group0=&%40group1=&%40columns=title%2Cid%2Cactivity%2Cversions%2Cstatus&%40filter=priority%2Cstatus&priority=1&status=1&%40pagesize=50&%40startwith=0 -- Thanks Benjamin Peterson "There's no place like 127.0.0.1."
For the multiprocessing module all I have left is the docs in rest
format - given I'm a rest newbie, it's taking longer than I thought
On Jun 8, 2008, at 7:38 PM, "Benjamin Peterson" wrote: As we approach the planned first betas for 2.6/3.0, my heart sinks
when I see the imposing list of 16 release blockers. [1] Luckily, most
of the issues have patches that just need *your* review. Others,
namely the Py3k exception issues, may require a little more
discussion, but I'm sure we can get it done. Let's get this release on time! [clapping] --
Thanks
Benjamin Peterson
"There's no place like 127.0.0.1."
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/jnoller%40gmail.com
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 5:33 AM, Jesse Noller
For the multiprocessing module all I have left is the docs in rest format - given I'm a rest newbie, it's taking longer than I thought
If you want to email what you have done to docs@python.org, we'd love to help! -- Cheers, Benjamin Peterson "There's no place like 127.0.0.1."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Jun 9, 2008, at 6:33 AM, Jesse Noller wrote:
For the multiprocessing module all I have left is the docs in rest format - given I'm a rest newbie, it's taking longer than I thought
It's okay if docs don't make it into the beta. That's the kind of thing that can (but still, must) be fixed up before the final release. - -Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBSE8M5XEjvBPtnXfVAQIBcQP/S5BMgNS/sOXajnU7eLfXGM39/PwStL8b HOv/MZiHtjmRx5Rtro7lDnjaf9u4Ae+V90a5Pt+aAIANSLenzl1GVcJuuQNP+baa trrTvvBGD3C78au76yOIKRZ0xfvv+rxQXo3mzQ4Yf3GiyOaDdhHMiar6qHlQhesK 1j6rghX/J0Q= =r31d -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Barry Warsaw
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Jun 9, 2008, at 6:33 AM, Jesse Noller wrote:
For the multiprocessing module all I have left is the docs in rest format - given I'm a rest newbie, it's taking longer than I thought
It's okay if docs don't make it into the beta. That's the kind of thing that can (but still, must) be fixed up before the final release.
Luckily, it's done now, and I think I will be able to check in multiprocessing tonight or tomorrow. -- Cheers, Benjamin Peterson "There's no place like 127.0.0.1."
I'll try to roll an updated patch with the review info tonight for you
On Jun 10, 2008, at 7:26 PM, "Benjamin Peterson" wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Barry Warsaw -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 On Jun 9, 2008, at 6:33 AM, Jesse Noller wrote: For the multiprocessing module all I have left is the docs in rest
format
- given I'm a rest newbie, it's taking longer than I thought It's okay if docs don't make it into the beta. That's the kind of
thing
that can (but still, must) be fixed up before the final release. Luckily, it's done now, and I think I will be able to check in
multiprocessing tonight or tomorrow. --
Cheers,
Benjamin Peterson
"There's no place like 127.0.0.1."
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
As we approach the planned first betas for 2.6/3.0, my heart sinks when I see the imposing list of 16 release blockers. [1] Luckily, most of the issues have patches that just need *your* review. Others, namely the Py3k exception issues, may require a little more discussion, but I'm sure we can get it done.
For issue 643841 (providing a ProxyMixin class in a new typetools module), aside from the minor tweak mentioned in the last couple of comments, I'm basically looking for a yea or nay from Barry or Guido. I think it's the best answer we're going to find to the problem of how to write type-agnostic delegation classes in a Python world without classic classes. Cheers, Nick. http://bugs.python.org/issue643841 -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Jun 9, 2008, at 7:28 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
As we approach the planned first betas for 2.6/3.0, my heart sinks when I see the imposing list of 16 release blockers. [1] Luckily, most of the issues have patches that just need *your* review. Others, namely the Py3k exception issues, may require a little more discussion, but I'm sure we can get it done.
For issue 643841 (providing a ProxyMixin class in a new typetools module), aside from the minor tweak mentioned in the last couple of comments, I'm basically looking for a yea or nay from Barry or Guido. I think it's the best answer we're going to find to the problem of how to write type-agnostic delegation classes in a Python world without classic classes.
I've updated the issue with my own opinion. Let's see what Guido thinks. - -Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBSE+/W3EjvBPtnXfVAQIP0QP7BNuejYBEZcp9n/iF8KicfKIJ9L39pNDA QWSW72ApVnwaLEebl1QPEfF5LBzjVSYqWu5RcuxYnFro61FIi6QSX91LN+fq+o0a YuPTa3P9VAIbrfpZQVT9MsLNTqcxtsrA6YtGyv5K48oPrkKCm/9/8+7EFOXeRmXQ gXBv7K+3ZT4= =qsrW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (4)
-
Barry Warsaw -
Benjamin Peterson -
Jesse Noller -
Nick Coghlan