Did you mean to use http://docs.python.org/devguide/developers.html instead of http://hg.python.org/committers.txt as the former lists why while the latter just lists usernames? On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 3:19 AM, georg.brandl <python-checkins@python.org>wrote:

http://hg.python.org/devguide/rev/b40bfc99c54f changeset: 548:b40bfc99c54f user: Georg Brandl <georg@python.org> date: Sun Sep 09 09:20:23 2012 +0200 summary: Update committers list location.

files: coredev.rst | 4 ++-- faq.rst | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/coredev.rst b/coredev.rst --- a/coredev.rst +++ b/coredev.rst @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ able to commit them without supervision.

A complete list of core developer usernames can be found at -http://www.python.org/dev/committers. :ref:`developers` lists when and why +http://hg.python.org/committers.txt. :ref:`developers` lists when and why someone received commit privileges.

@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ This should match your username on the issue tracker.

You can verify your commit access by looking at -http://www.python.org/dev/committers which lists all core developers by +http://hg.python.org/committers.txt which lists all core developers by username. If you want to practice, there is a `test repository <http://hg.python.org/test/>`_ where you can freely commit and push any changes you like:: diff --git a/faq.rst b/faq.rst --- a/faq.rst +++ b/faq.rst @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ On the `issue tracker`_, most core developers will have the Python logo appear next to their name.

-.. _full list of developers: http://www.python.org/dev/committers +.. _full list of developers: http://hg.python.org/committers.txt

What standards of behaviour are expected in these communication channels?

-- Repository URL: http://hg.python.org/devguide

_______________________________________________ Python-checkins mailing list Python-checkins@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-checkins