28 Mar
2001
28 Mar
'01
10:25 p.m.
This one Aahz singled out previously as a canonical example of a patch he would *not* include, because adding new attributes seemed potentially disruptive to him (but why? maybe someone was depending on the precise value of len(dir(xrange(42)))?).
There is a patch on SF which backports that change without introducing these attributes in the 2.0.1 class. Regards, Martin
8669
Age (days ago)
8669
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Martin v. Loewis