From: Jeremy Hylton [mailto:jeremy@alum.mit.edu]

...

...

...

...

...

"TD" == Timothy Delaney <Delaney> writes:

TD> But I don't think it's a candidate yet. Among other things, the TD> tracing functionality is not hooked into each new thread. Not an TD> issue for my current project (which must run single-threaded due TD> to being invoked inside something that must run in a single TD> thread) but it is an issue for a version in the standard TD> library.

Maybe you should checkin what you have now. If it's at least as functional as trace.py, then it's an improvement over what we've got in the std library now. You/we can improve it as 2.3 development proceeds.

Ooh - believe me - you don't want to see the code as it is now. Yuk! Needs some major cleanup (esp. after the hacking I've done to make it work with Jython). No way I would check something that disgusting in where other people could see it ;) Unfortunately, I'm really busy right now. Maybe I'll get to spend some time on it over my 2-week break coming up. Plus as I said, I need to check with my employer - it has been partially developed on company time, and for a company project. Maybe I can get it into my goals and objectives ;) I should use the sandbox though. Unfortunately, I can't compile 2.3 at home ... MinGW still doesn't work, and I don't have a BSD or Linux box set up (the only available machine is currently serving as my internet gateway until I fix another machine). Tim Delaney