On 11/08/2010 17.59, Mark Dickinson wrote:

On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Tim Golden wrote:

...

Thanks to whoever's been working on the new Summary lists on the Issue Tracker. Ezio Melotti, I assume.

Yes :) (see http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue329)

...

The "Followed by you" / "Created by you" / "Assigned to you" are just what the doctor ordered. Agreed. Now I can get rid of my own equivalent custom searches. :)

One niggle: we seem to have lost the simple 'Open Issues' search under 'Summaries' on the left-hand side of the page.

I was expecting someone to complain about it.

This feels a bit odd, given that it's what's displayed by default when a non-registered user goes to http://bugs.python.org. If that non-registered user then clicks on something else, like 'easy issues', there doesn't seem to be any easy way (that I can see) to go back to the original list of all open issues.

There actually is an easy way: the big python logo on the top left of the page. However I understand that this is not so obvious, so I can either add back the 'open issues' link or try to make it more obvious.

Of course, as a registered user, I can add my own custom search for that if I want it. But I can't help feeling that non-registered users might miss this.

Mark

Best Regards, Ezio Melotti

On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Mark Dickinson wrote:

Well, perhaps I'm the only person bothered by this (and when I say 'bothered', it's not exactly keeping me up at nights).

I'm not going to lose sleep over it either, but the logo-link is generally considered very non-discoverable. Keeping a query in the sidebar doesn't seem a huge price to pay.   -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr.    <fdrake at gmail.com> "A storm broke loose in my mind."  --Albert Einstein

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:

On 11 Aug, 2010, at 16:21, Tim Golden wrote:

...

Thanks to whoever's been working on the new Summary lists on the Issue Tracker. The "Followed by you" / "Created by you" / "Assigned to you" are just what the doctor ordered.

I'm not quite happy about them because these reports include closed issues which is noise most of the time, and because issues aren't grouped or ordered by priorities.

I like the new list of standard queries, and don't mind having them sorted by activity rather than priority. (And with the closed issues grouped after the open issues, that aspect doesn't really bother me either). However, it would be nice to at least have the issue priority *visible* in the results for these searches. If I want more than that, it's easy enough to keep my own queries around. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan@gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia