On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 at 10:01 Paul Moore wrote:

On 30 January 2018 at 17:10, Antoine Pitrou wrote:

...

This is missing a bit of context. Is this about python-dev? Some other ML?

While I'll admit to being curious about what prompted this, honestly, it's none of my business - and so I think that Brett's posting should be viewed as a general reminder, without any specific context implied.

What Paul said. :)

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018, 17:30 Steven D'Aprano, wrote:

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 06:00:36PM +0000, Paul Moore wrote:

...

On 30 January 2018 at 17:10, Antoine Pitrou wrote:

...

This is missing a bit of context. Is this about python-dev? Some other ML?

While I'll admit to being curious about what prompted this, honestly, it's none of my business - and so I think that Brett's posting should be viewed as a general reminder, without any specific context implied.

But specific content was not just implied but explicitly eluded to: Brett stated that

"the last 3 days I have had two situations come up where I was asked for my opinion in regards to possible CoC violations"

so it is our business and every one of us should be wondering what we personally might have written that could have been a possible CoC violation, on this or some other list.

In both instances the people who were involved have been spoken to, so if no one talked with you about how they felt then it wasn't you (i.e. I'm not being vague to make everyone tread carefully in case it's them). As I said, people just asked for my opinion and I provided it. At this point please just ignore my comment about what personally triggered the email. It's not the focal point of what I was hoping to communicate, just so the email didn't seem totally random is all. -Brett

As Brett says, none of us are beyond reproach.

-- Steve _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40python.org