Just wanted to share some documentation I’ve put together (and a snapshot of the code) on the effort to improve the appearance and behaviour of IDLE: http://www.tkdocs.com/tutorial/idle.html <http://www.tkdocs.com/tutorial/idle.html> (There’s also currently a post on Hacker News about this). While Terry can better speak to plans and timelines about getting these changes integrated in, it seems a good time to get some other people to have a closer look and share any feedback. Mark
there is also http://idlex.sourceforge.net/about.html to mention. 2015-11-06 18:08 GMT+01:00 Mark Roseman <mark@markroseman.com>:
Just wanted to share some documentation I’ve put together (and a snapshot of the code) on the effort to improve the appearance and behaviour of IDLE:
http://www.tkdocs.com/tutorial/idle.html
(There’s also currently a post on Hacker News about this).
While Terry can better speak to plans and timelines about getting these changes integrated in, it seems a good time to get some other people to have a closer look and share any feedback.
Mark
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/cmkleffner%40gmail.com
On 7 November 2015 at 03:08, Mark Roseman <mark@markroseman.com> wrote:
Just wanted to share some documentation I’ve put together (and a snapshot of the code) on the effort to improve the appearance and behaviour of IDLE:
http://www.tkdocs.com/tutorial/idle.html
(There’s also currently a post on Hacker News about this).
While Terry can better speak to plans and timelines about getting these changes integrated in, it seems a good time to get some other people to have a closer look and share any feedback.
Very cool! Thanks to all involved for these modernisation efforts :) Regards, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Michiel Overtoom <motoom@xs4all.nl> wrote:
On 06 Nov 2015, at 18:08, Mark Roseman <mark@markroseman.com> wrote:
(There’s also currently a post on Hacker News about this).
You have a link for that HN item? I've looked at the first five pages but couldn't find it.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10519785 I used the big "Search" box at the bottom of the main Hacker News page. ;)
Greetings,
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/rymg19%40gmail.com
-- Ryan [ERROR]: Your autotools build scripts are 200 lines longer than your program. Something’s wrong. http://kirbyfan64.github.io/
On 11 Nov 2015, at 00:23, Ryan Gonzalez <rymg19@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for the URL. I consider myself a reasonably seasoned IDE user, having used Visual Studio, emacs with SLIME, Borland C++Builder, Xcode, Delphi, Eclipse, LightTable and PyCharm, and probably I forgot some. However, I still use IDLE regularly on Windows and Unix systems (not on OSX). I don't care much about advanced IDE features. Basically I want a programmers' text editor with minimal syntax highlighting and a shortcut key like F9 or CMD+R to run my program. When developing webapps, I rely on the 'save' function of the editor and having the web framework reload the sources automatically while in developer mode. For debugging, I use Python's 'pdb' or the more fancier 'pudb' where appropriate. I really like to see IDLE stay as part of the Python installation. And I'm sure, with all the attention it gets nowadays, that it'll stay a minimal but usable basic IDE for developing Python programs. Greetings,
participants (5)
-
Carl Kleffner -
Mark Roseman -
Michiel Overtoom -
Nick Coghlan -
Ryan Gonzalez