Please can we have the following RFCs added to the references section that cover many of the aspects covered by this PEP? RFC 791 - Internet Protocol RFC 1918 - Address Allocation for Private Internets RFC 3330 - Special-Use IPv4 Addresses RFC 4291 - IPv6 Addressing Architecture RFC 4632 - Classless Inter-domain Routing (CIDR): The Internet Address Dave M.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 9:26 AM, DrKJam <drkjam@gmail.com> wrote:
Please can we have the following RFCs added to the references section that cover many of the aspects covered by this PEP?
RFC 791 - Internet Protocol RFC 1918 - Address Allocation for Private Internets RFC 3330 - Special-Use IPv4 Addresses RFC 4291 - IPv6 Addressing Architecture RFC 4632 - Classless Inter-domain Routing (CIDR): The Internet Address
+1 -- Daniel Stutzbach, Ph.D. President, Stutzbach Enterprises, LLC <http://stutzbachenterprises.com>
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 7:26 AM, DrKJam <drkjam@gmail.com> wrote:
Please can we have the following RFCs added to the references section that cover many of the aspects covered by this PEP?
RFC 791 - Internet Protocol RFC 1918 - Address Allocation for Private Internets RFC 3330 - Special-Use IPv4 Addresses RFC 4291 - IPv6 Addressing Architecture RFC 4632 - Classless Inter-domain Routing (CIDR): The Internet Address
Sure, can you give me an idea of what specifically you're looking to the rfc's to clarify? simply adding 5 rfc's to the the PEP wouldn't seem to enhance its readability.
Dave M.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-dev%40hda3.com
On 17 Sep 2009, at 15:40, Peter Moody <peter@hda3.com> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 7:26 AM, DrKJam <drkjam@gmail.com> wrote:
Please can we have the following RFCs added to the references section that cover many of the aspects covered by this PEP?
RFC 791 - Internet Protocol RFC 1918 - Address Allocation for Private Internets RFC 3330 - Special-Use IPv4 Addresses RFC 4291 - IPv6 Addressing Architecture RFC 4632 - Classless Inter-domain Routing (CIDR): The Internet Address
Sure, can you give me an idea of what specifically you're looking to the rfc's to clarify? simply adding 5 rfc's to the the PEP wouldn't seem to enhance its readability.
I would hope that these RFCs form the technical basis upon which much of this library depends.
Dave M.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-dev%40hda3.com
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:50 AM, David Moss <drkjam@gmail.com> wrote:
On 17 Sep 2009, at 15:40, Peter Moody <peter@hda3.com> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 7:26 AM, DrKJam <drkjam@gmail.com> wrote:
Please can we have the following RFCs added to the references section that cover many of the aspects covered by this PEP?
RFC 791 - Internet Protocol RFC 1918 - Address Allocation for Private Internets RFC 3330 - Special-Use IPv4 Addresses RFC 4291 - IPv6 Addressing Architecture RFC 4632 - Classless Inter-domain Routing (CIDR): The Internet Address
Sure, can you give me an idea of what specifically you're looking to the rfc's to clarify? simply adding 5 rfc's to the the PEP wouldn't seem to enhance its readability.
I would hope that these RFCs form the technical basis upon which much of this library depends.
yes, and my question was is there something(s) in particular you wish to see highlighted which will help clarify some confusion you currently have, or do you feel that simply adding 5 rfc's to the references section adds to the overall readability of the PEP? see http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0333/ for an example of what I mean.
Dave M.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-dev%40hda3.com
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:59:22AM -0700, Peter Moody wrote:
currently have, or do you feel that simply adding 5 rfc's to the references section adds to the overall readability of the PEP?
I would list them simply because it's not obvious which RFC specifies the format of IP addresses or how they're allocated. e.g. if I search for "rfc ip address format", most of the hits are for RFC 3587, "IPv6 Global Unicast Address Format", which doesn't actually explain IPv6 address syntax. --amk
participants (5)
-
A.M. Kuchling -
Daniel Stutzbach -
David Moss -
DrKJam
-
Peter Moody