PEP 318 needs a rewrite

March 8, 2004
9:43 p.m.
Guido van Rossum wrote:
Instead of arguing in circles, can someone (or a small group) rewrite the PEP to contain a summary of the arguments for and against various forms?
I volunteer to help or do, whichever Kevin (or others) prefer. I suspect that any draft will trigger a number of small objections and clarifications. To avoid recluttering python-dev, I want to iron out as many of them as possible before the next PEP posting. Please email me if you want to see (or write) the interim versions. -jJ
7670
Age (days ago)
7670
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Jewett, Jim J