Since .next() seems to be equivalent to .send(None), why wasn't .next() just
given an optional parameter which defaults to None?
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Simon Forman <sajmikins(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Andrey Fedorov <anfedorov(a)gmail.com>
> > As far as I can tell, a generator's .next() is equivalent to .send(None).
> > this true?
> They are equivalent AFAIK.
> > If so, [why] aren't they unified in a method with a single argument which
> > to None?
> > - Andrey
> next() predates send().