On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:

def call(func):
def inner(cls):
return func(**{k:v for k,v in cls.__dict__.items() if not
k.startswith('_')})
return inner

class Foo:
def __init__(self):
self._x = 42
@call(property)
class x:
def fget(self):
return self._x
def fset(self, value):
self._x = value
def fdel(self):
del self._x

I think this looks perfectly nice, actually. I was just trying to work out almost the same thing but using a `def x()` rather than `class f` as the nesting construct. I think Chris' is better though. I think I might want to define something like:

make_property = call(property)

class Foo:
def __init__(self):
self._x = 42
@make_property
class x:
def fget(self):
return self._x
def fset(self, value):
self._x = value
def fdel(self):
del self._x

Keeping medicines from the bloodstreams of the sick; food
from the bellies of the hungry; books from the hands of the
uneducated; technology from the underdeveloped; and putting
advocates of freedom in prisons. Intellectual property is
to the 21st century what the slave trade was to the 16th.