http://bugs.python.org/issue23681 to track this for Python 3.5.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:16 AM Guido van Rossum email@example.com wrote:
As long as it's part of -b/-bb this sounds like a useful (though small) bit of help for people in the last throes of porting a big package to PY3. As for how many false positives it will trigger, who knows? The most likely case would be if people use dicts whose keys can be bytestrings or ints -- I know that's a popular hobby when it comes to str/int, but I don't know if it's also common with bytes/int. I guess the only way to find out is to build and release it.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Brett Cannon firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
One of the rather subtle issues with writing Python 2/3 code is that indexing on bytes in Python 2 returns a length-1 bytes object while in Python 3 it returns an int. Because ==/!= always returns True/False it can be a very subtle failure and tough to track down.
What do people think of extending -b/-bb in Python 3 to warn when performing equality between an int and a bytes object of any length? I don't want to restrict to length-1 bytes objects because people may be doing comparisons where the result can be length-1 or any other length and thus would still have a subtle bug to pick up. Do people think this would raise a ton of false-positives? Would people find it useful?
Python-ideas mailing list Pythonemail@example.com https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
-- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)