
Oct. 29, 2013
7:04 a.m.
On 29 October 2013 23:55, Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 29/10/2013 13:32, Nick Coghlan wrote:
So, at this point, I still quite like the idea of adding a "reverse=True" keyword only arg to slice and range (with the semantics of rslice above), and then revisit the idea of offering syntax for it in Python 3.5.
I sincerely hope that you meant reverse=False? :)
I could claim that I was referring to the way you would call it (which is why the subclass idea is also attractive), but yes, that's really just a typo and the default would be the other way around :) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia