2008/11/5 Josiah Carlson <josiah.carlson@gmail.com>:
Adding *yet another* Python-centric serialization language seems more than a little silly to me; it seems like a waste of time. Of course you are free to develop this method as you see fit, but don't be surprised if you bring it to python-dev and they say, "no." PyON is just that-born. The PyON concept and it's implementation is at an early stage. Therefore, it too early offer python-dev.
Personally I don't consider PyON as another serialization language. I would like to see it as literal object notation based on python syntax. Currently, this is not possible, because it is necessary to expand the syntax of the python language. I don't expect this soon. At this stage PyON uses the existing syntax of python language for the human readable/writeble literal representation of objects. I hope that one day someone will propose to expand the syntax of the language and introduce literal notation for objects representation embedded into python language. Best regards, Zaur