3 Oct
2011
3 Oct
'11
10:40 a.m.
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 18:20 +1300, Greg Ewing wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
So I would declare that "for x in stuff" always implies a *new* iteration, and devise another syntax for continuing an existing one, such as "for x from stuff".
I like that. +1 for what ever future python it can be put in. Also, we currently don't have an InconclusiveException, which would mean; it may be True or False, but I can't tell, So handle this carefully. But it seems to me that nondeterministic results, make programmers uncomfortable. So I have a feeling that things like this would not be popular. Cheers, Ron