
12 Aug
2016
12 Aug
'16
9:14 p.m.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Paul Moore p.f.moore@gmail.com wrote:
In which case, something IS better than nothing.
I'm not arguing that we do nothing. Are you saying we should use CP_UTF8 *in preference* to wide character APIs? Or that we should implement CP_UTF8 first and then wide chars later?
Honestly, I don't understand the details enough to argue either way.
Or are we in violent agreement that we should implement wide chars?
probably -- to the extend I understand the issues :-)
But I am arguing that anything that makes it "better" that actually gets implemented is better than a "right" solution that no one has the time to make it happen, or that we can't agree on anyway.
-CHB
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
Chris.Barker@noaa.gov