On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.moore@gmail.com> wrote:
> In which case, something IS better than nothing.

I'm not arguing that we do nothing. Are you saying we should use
CP_UTF8 *in preference* to wide character APIs? Or that we should
implement CP_UTF8 first and then wide chars later?

Honestly, I don't understand the details enough to argue either way.
Or are we in
violent agreement that we should implement wide chars?

probably -- to the extend I understand the issues :-)

But I am arguing that anything that makes it "better" that actually gets implemented is better than a "right" solution that no one has the time to  make it happen, or that we can't agree on anyway.



Christopher Barker, Ph.D.

Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R            (206) 526-6959   voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE   (206) 526-6329   fax
Seattle, WA  98115       (206) 526-6317   main reception