On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Chris Barker <chris.barker@noaa.gov> wrote:
But one reason to take it off-list is that these very long, if not endless, circular conversations gives the impression that it really matters which specif choices are made, and that we will never come to a consensus about it, so this should not go in the stdlib.
I would suggest that, as PEP author, you guide the conversation a bit by asking specific questions that you want to answer in the PEP. Steven's not the only one who's been seeing an awful lot of emails lately; I've just been skimming them, myself. But you could reboot the conversation by starting up some very specific discussion on points that will actually affect the PEP, and then things will hopefully be fresh and interesting again :) ChrisA