On 3 Feb 2019, at 09:54, Adrien Ricocotam firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
Nice that you implemented it !
I think all the issues you have right now would go of using another operation. I proposed the @ notation that is clear and different from everything else, plus the operator is called "matmul" so it completely makes sense.
The @ operator is meant for matrix multiplication (see PEP 465) and is already used for that in NumPy. IMHO just that is a good enough reason for not using @ as an elementwise application operator (ignoring if having an such an operator is a good idea in the first place).