On 01/04/2015 22:14, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
On 02.04.15 00:05, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 01/04/2015 18:51, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Ryan Gonzalez email@example.com wrote:
Attached is a new module loader I've been working on that's an order of magnitude times faster than the current one. What would it take for this to be merged?
LGTM. Before you can get this merged, you'll need to sign a contributor agreement, if you haven't already. Further discussion of the proposal's details can happen on the tracker:
What's the actual issue number, I get "There is no issue with id 401" ?
Cris missed. The correct link is http://bugs.python.org/issue0104.
"There is no issue with id 104"
On 01/04/2015 22:14, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:> I think Chris meant to link to http://bugs.python.org/issue0404 , sorry for any confusion.
"There is no issue with id 404"
Is this an April Fools?