data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0b6e/b0b6e5571f2e98d8fe6a328f552121d90e4c0281" alt=""
I mentioned this on the python-dev list [1] originally as a +1 to someone else suggesting the idea [2]. It also came up in a response to my post that I can't seem to find in the archives, so I've quoted it below [3]. As the subject says, the idea would be to add a "+" and "+=" operator to dict that would provide the following behavior:
{'x': 1, 'y': 2} + {'z': 3} {'x': 1, 'y': 2, 'z': 3}
With the only potentially non obvious case I can see then is when there are duplicate keys, in which case the syntax could just be defined that last setter wins, e.g.:
{'x': 1, 'y': 2} + {'x': 3} {'x': 3, 'y': 2}
Which is analogous to the example:
new_dict = dict1.copy() new_dict.update(dict2)
With "+=" then essentially ending up being an alias for ``dict.update(...)``. I'd be happy to champion this as a PEP if the feedback / public opinion heads in that direction. [1] https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-February/138150.html [2] https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-February/138116.html [3] John Wong --
Well looking at just list a + b yields new list a += b yields modified a then there is also .extend in list. etc. so do we want to follow list's footstep? I like + because + is more natural to read. Maybe this needs to be a separate thread. I am actually amazed to remember dict + dict is not possible... there must be a reason (performance??) for this...
Cheers, ~ Ian Lee