2009/5/5 Aahz
<aahz@pythoncraft.com>
On Mon, May 04, 2009, CTO wrote:
> Aahz:
>> On Mon, May 04, 2009, John Graham wrote:
>>>
>>> Has anyone ever suggested a standard pylint, something that might be
>>> distributed with the interpreter/libraries? As important as the
>>> 'look-and-feel' is to Python, it seems like an automated style-checker
>>> / 'you probably didn't meant to do that' engine would be a good idea
>>> to introduce even newbies to the language instead of them having to
>>> search it out.
>>
>> It's been mentioned; I don't remember why it never got any traction,
>> whether because the authors didn't want to deal with it or nobody
>> bothered submitting a PEP (this definitely needs a PEP).
>
> I'll volunteer to put one together if somebody's willing to walk me
> through the PEP process.
Sure! I suggest that you start by checking with the maintainers of
pychecker and pylint to find out how they feel about it.
PyLint is huge and depends on a whole ream of support libraries. I think the logilab guys would probably rather maintain it themselves and I'm not sure it is really suitable for the standard library anyway.
PyFlakes and PyChecker are both very good; although neither does as much as PyLint. I'm not sure if either of the two does enough to enforce full PEP-8 compliance.
Michael Foord
--
Aahz (aahz@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"It is easier to optimize correct code than to correct optimized code."
--Bill Harlan
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas