Sept. 23, 2010
8:52 p.m.
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:39:01 -0400 Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:
If I were writing a class intended to implement an particular ABC, I would be happy to have an automated check function that might catch errors. 100% testing is hard to achieve.
How would an automatic check function solve anything, if you don't test that the class does what is expected? Again, this is exactly the argument for compile-time type checking, and it is routinely pointed out that it is mostly useless.