18 Feb
2009
18 Feb
'09
4:58 a.m.
Bruce Leban wrote:
That's a good reason to *not* support a test/change operation in regular sets as it may lead people to think (falsely) that it provide some kind of concurrency protection.
Well, perhaps it should provide concurrency protection. If it's implemented in C with the GIL held, it probably wouldn't be hard to make that guarantee. -- Greg