Indeed, perhaps virtual particles can never divide by zero and thus the observed laws of thermodynamic systems are preserved.
Would you please be so kind as to respond in the main thread so that this is one consecutive thread?
No, 2 times something is greater than something. Something over something
is 1. If we change the division axiom to be piecewise with an exception only for infinity, we could claim that any problem involving division of a symbol is unsolvable because the symbol could be infinity. This is incorrect: x / 2 is unsolvable because x could be infinity x / 2 > x / 3 (where x > 0; Z+) is indeterminate because if x is infinity, then they are equal.
Which of these are you arguing should fail if Python changes to returning [+/-]inf instead of raising ZeroDivisionError?
assert 1 / 0 != 2 / 0 assert 2*inf > inf assert inf / inf == 1
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 5:41 PM Richard Damon Richard@damon-family.org wrote:
On 10/11/20 5:04 PM, Wes Turner wrote:
So you're arguing that the scalar is irrelevant? That `2*inf == inf`?
I disagree because: ```2*inf > inf```
inf / inf = 1 # When we solve for symbol x: 2*inf*x = inf 2*x = 1 x = 1/2 # If we discard the scalar instead: 2*inf*x = inf inf*x = inf x = 1 # I think it's specious to argue that there are infinity solutions; that axioms of symbolic mathematics do not apply because infinity
Treating inf as any other number because it works out 'symbolically' is one of the recipes that allow you to prove that 1 == 2, thus symbolic math needs to work with certain preconditions that avoid the generation of 'numbers' like infinity into the system (or somewhat related, avoid a divide by 0)
-- Richard Damon _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- firstname.lastname@example.org To unsubscribe send an email to email@example.com https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://firstname.lastname@example.org/message/SQNY5W... Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/