On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 20:08:35 -0800 Andrew Barnert email@example.com wrote:
On Feb 7, 2020, at 16:11, Steven D'Aprano firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
Shai Berger wants to set it implicily, based on where the raise is. If it is "directly" under the except line, implicitly set the cause.
I interpreted “directly under” as meaning “directly lexically contained by”, not “on the next physical line”. And even if that isn’t what Shai meant, it’s what I meant. :)
Just for the record, that *is* what I meant.