Yanghao Hua wrote:
If I use python to do something and I have to type more chars it doesn't make sense for me.
If you shorten it to "n" you get
x.n = 4
which is exactly the same number of characters as your "<==" proposal:
x <== 4
Getting a bit more creative, you could use the little-known "._=" operator that already exists in Python. :-)
x ._= 4