21 Oct
2009
21 Oct
'09
11:45 p.m.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Antoine Pitrou
Brett Cannon
writes: One thing I would like to see happen for this moratorium is us following a more rigid release schedule in terms of feature freeze. So I would propose that starting with 3.2 we feature freeze 18 months after 3.2's feature freeze.
Time-based releases can be good, but 18 months until the feature freeze (which, realistically, gives us a new release every 2 years) sounds much too long to me.
Regards
Antoine.
+1 18 months seems too long.