Aug. 11, 2010
7:41 a.m.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
2. The 'cocall' construct checks whether the function supports cocalls, and if so, proceeds as previously specified. Otherwise, it calls the function normally and returns the result.
Does this scheme sound any better?
Well, considering: On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 4:52 AM, <ghazel@gmail.com> wrote:
It seems like calling a normal function using this special calling mechanism could treat them like a cofunction which produced zero iterations and a single return value.
I would say yes. :) -Greg