Tl;dr: Join strings together with exactly one space between non-blank text where they join. I propose a meaning for s1 & s2 where s1 and s2 are strings. Namely, that it should be equivalent to s1.rstrip() + (' ' if (s1.strip() and s2.strip()) else '') + s2.lstrip() Informally, this will join the two strings together with exactly one space between the last non-blank text in s1 and the first non-blank text in s2. Example: " bar " & " foo " == " bar foo " This operator is associative, so there is no ambiguity in expressions such as s1 & s2 & s3 There *is* a possible ambiguity in expressions such as s1 & s2 + s3 where the relative precedence of `&` and `+` matters when s2 consists solely of white space. E.g. " A " & " " + " C" would evaluate to " A C" not to " A C" because `+` has a higher precedence than '&'. Utility: In decades of experience with another language which had such an operator (spelt differently) I have frequently found it useful for constructing human-readable output (e.g. log output, debug/error messages, on-screen labels). Cognitive burden: This would of course be one more thing to learn. But I suggest that it is fairly intuitive that s1 + s2 s1 & s2 both suggest that two strings are being combined in some way. Bars to overcome: This change would require no fundamental change to Python; just adding an `__and__ function to the str class. Backward compatibility: Given that `str1 & str2` currently raises TypeError, this change would be close to 100% backward-compatible. Alternative meanings: As far as I know nobody has ever suggested an alternative meaning for `&` on strings. Bikeshedding: (1) I don't think it is important for the utility of this change whether `&` strips off all whitespace, or just spaces. I think it is better if it strips off all whitespace, so that it can be understood as working similarly to strip(). (2) The definition could be simplified to s1.rstrip() + ' ' + s2.lstrip() (leave an initial/final space when one string is whitespace only). Again the operator would be associative. Again I don't think this is important. Rob Cliffe