On 12 Feb 2014 19:54, "Terry Reedy" <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:
>
> On 2/12/2014 4:24 AM, David Foster wrote:
>
>> Tulip, however, does not appear to address a slightly different problem
>> I run into where I need different parts of the same conceptual function
>> to run on specific *different* threads. Consider the following code
>> which needs different parts executed on a UI thread, database thread,
>> and background thread:
>
>
> ...
> There is a tulip google group where tulip discussion takes place. I don't have the specific reference though.

With 3.4 nearing release, I suspect we're going to have to get used to the idea of gently redirecting pip and asyncio/tulip discussions :)

An update to the "communications" section of the dev guide may be in order, too.

Cheers,
Nick.

>
> --
> Terry Jan Reedy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list
> Python-ideas@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/