Compared to conditionals, programming by Exception is slow.

You can use the timeit module (or the IPython %timeit magic function) to run comparative performance benchmarks.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coding_by_exception :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exception_handling#Criticism :

> Exception handling is often not handled correctly in software, especially when there are multiple sources of exceptions; data flow analysis of 5 million lines of Java code found over 1300 exception handling defects.[15] Citing multiple prior studies by others (1999–2004) and their own results, Weimer and Necula wrote that a significant problem with exceptions is that they "create hidden control-flow paths that are difficult for programmers to reason about".[15]:8:27
>
> Go was initially released with exception handling explicitly omitted, with the developers arguing that it obfuscated control flow.[16] Later, the exception-like panic/recover mechanism was added to the language, which the Go authors 
> ** advise using only for unrecoverable errors that should halt the entire process.[17][18][19][20] **
>
> Exceptions, as unstructured flow, increase the risk of resource leaks (such as escaping a section locked by a mutex, or one temporarily holding a file open) or inconsistent state. There are various techniques for resource management in the presence of exceptions, most commonly combining the dispose pattern with some form of unwind protection (like a finally clause), which automatically releases the resource when control exits a section of code.

[Emphasis added]

Neither of these documents advise against using Exceptions for control flow:

- https://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/errors.html#exceptions
- https://docs.python.org/3/library/exceptions.html

One alternative to Exceptions is to return a (value, err) tuple and have conditionals for each possible value of err.

(value, err) = func()
if err is not None:
    # [...]


On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 1:10 PM Wes Turner <wes.turner@gmail.com> wrote:
Exception.args holds the arguments passed to the exception.

You could add type checking with dataclass, or you can just access
Exception.args or
sys.exc_info().args:

```python
class Exception2(Exception):
    pass
                                                                                                                                                         
try:
    raise Exception2('error str', dict(a='1', b=2))
except Exception2 as e:
    print(('args', e.args))
    assert e.args[0] == 'error str'
    assert e.args[1] == dict(a='1', b=2) 

    import sys
    type_, value, traceback = sys.exc_info()
    assert value.args[0] == 'error str'
    assert value.args[1] == dict(a='1', b=2)
                                                                                                                                                         
# ('args', ('error str', {'a': '1', 'b': 2}))
```

On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 12:56 PM David Mertz <mertz@gnosis.cx> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 6:18 AM Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> wrote:
I don't think that a two line class (perhaps a couple of extra
lines if you give it a docstring) justifies the name "boilerplate":

    class MySpecialException(Exception):
        pass

I think that in 22 years of using Python, I have never written an exception that took more than these two lines of code.

Heck, I even have my memory jogged of string exceptions reading this.  When did those go away fully, 1.5.2? 2.1?

I DID in the discussion, immediately think of making an exception a dataclass, as someone else replied with.  I guess if you want cargo in your exception, that's a pretty good way to do it.  But really the ONLY thing I ever want in an exception is an inheritance tree.  An exception feels like a really unnatural way to pass around data (that said, there are a few exceptions written by other libraries where some attribute or another is useful in my except blocks.  Perhaps I should consider that, beyond inspecting the traceback when needed.

If you really want a snazzy highly-parameterized exception, write it yourself as a class factory.  I won't particularly like the antipattern, but it's available now.

if some_bad_thing:
    raise ExceptionMaker("BadStuffErrror", details, plus, more_details)

Implementation of 'ExceptionMaker' left to readers.  But it's possible to write once.


_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-leave@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/M7LP4OMSEU47MBWX75KGBM7343SH5XGI/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/