Sept. 26, 2010
2:34 p.m.
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote:
Couple that with the extra function call overhead (since these wouldn't have real typeslots) and it still seems like a less than stellar idea.
As another use case for solid, efficient generic function support though... great idea :)
At the cost of even more execution overhead? :)
I did put that "efficient" in there for a reason! Now, I'm not saying anything about how *reasonable* that idea is, but I can dream ;) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia