June 25, 2012
6:46 p.m.
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Christian Heimes <lists@cheimes.de> wrote:
Am 25.06.2012 17:03, schrieb Kim Gräsman:
This is a very valid concern -- if the process dies unexpectedly I'd leave the file replaced and the original in some temporary directory. Not sure if there's a way around that, probably not.
Your algorithm doesn't take SIGKILL, SIGSEV or server crash into account. I don't see a chance to compensate for these problems. How about you fix the 3rd party code instead?
-1 for addition of broken code.
Duly noted :-) It's simple enough and works well in my narrow context, so I'll just keep it to myself. Cheers, - Kim