Another approach to __experimental__ could be a semi-official "python-experimental" package on pypi which contains all the stuff that's already been talked about. It's just one extra package to depend on and could follow its own release cycle. I don't know if this is better than including it in the stdlib (I like the idea of __experimental__ myself), but maybe its another idea to consider.

David

On Sep 1, 2011 8:40 PM, "Barry Warsaw" <barry@python.org> wrote:
> On Aug 31, 2011, at 10:51 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
>>2 -> 3: galactic release
>
> OMGWTFBBQ release
>
>>3.2 -> 3.3: feature release (also 3 -> 3.1)
>
> Don't you mean '3.0 -> 3.1' ?
>
>>3.2.1 -> 3.2.2: bugfix release (also 3.2 -> 3.2.1)
>
> +1!
> -Barry
>